<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear CNET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eternallyoptimistic.com/2006/11/24/dear-cnet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eternallyoptimistic.com/2006/11/24/dear-cnet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:44:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunnar</title>
		<link>http://eternallyoptimistic.com/2006/11/24/dear-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eternaloptimist.wordpress.com/2006/11/24/dear-cnet/#comment-192</guid>
		<description>I would rank this woman ahead of Daryl Hannah


&quot;Scientific American 50: Research Leader of the Year

RESEARCH LEADER OF THE YEAR
Angela Belcher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
This eclectic investigator draws inspiration from nature&#039;s genius for building things at the nanoscale
The crux of nanotechnology is the problem of self-assembly, getting uncooperative atoms to link and align themselves up in precise ways. We know it can be done, of course: life persists by turning molecules into complex biological machinery. How fitting, then, that one of today&#039;s most creative materials scientists, Angela Belcher of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has turned to nature for assistance. Belcher has pioneered the use of custom-evolved viruses in synthesizing nano-scale wires and arrays, fusing different research disciplines into something uniquely her own.
... She decided that she would teach nature to work with the rest of the list. &quot;The aim is to work our way through the whole periodic table and be able to design materials of all kinds in a controlled way. My biggest goal is to have a DNA sequence that can code for the synthesis of any useful material,&quot; she told MIT&#039;s Technology Review....&quot;

http://www.sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=CA13F432-E7F2-99DF-3DD2C7F789E34178

I would also rank her ahead of Lisa Simpson, but when Lisa grows up...watch out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would rank this woman ahead of Daryl Hannah</p>
<p>&#8220;Scientific American 50: Research Leader of the Year</p>
<p>RESEARCH LEADER OF THE YEAR<br />
Angela Belcher<br />
Massachusetts Institute of Technology<br />
This eclectic investigator draws inspiration from nature&#8217;s genius for building things at the nanoscale<br />
The crux of nanotechnology is the problem of self-assembly, getting uncooperative atoms to link and align themselves up in precise ways. We know it can be done, of course: life persists by turning molecules into complex biological machinery. How fitting, then, that one of today&#8217;s most creative materials scientists, Angela Belcher of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has turned to nature for assistance. Belcher has pioneered the use of custom-evolved viruses in synthesizing nano-scale wires and arrays, fusing different research disciplines into something uniquely her own.<br />
&#8230; She decided that she would teach nature to work with the rest of the list. &#8220;The aim is to work our way through the whole periodic table and be able to design materials of all kinds in a controlled way. My biggest goal is to have a DNA sequence that can code for the synthesis of any useful material,&#8221; she told MIT&#8217;s Technology Review&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=CA13F432-E7F2-99DF-3DD2C7F789E34178" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=CA13F432-E7F2-99DF-3DD2C7F789E34178</a></p>
<p>I would also rank her ahead of Lisa Simpson, but when Lisa grows up&#8230;watch out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don (is that a ranking in your pocket?) Molaro</title>
		<link>http://eternallyoptimistic.com/2006/11/24/dear-cnet/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Don (is that a ranking in your pocket?) Molaro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eternaloptimist.wordpress.com/2006/11/24/dear-cnet/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>According to Google:

Paris Hilton: 2,740,000
Lisa Simpson: 2,690,000
Marie Curie:  2,040,000
Daryl Hannah: 1,520,000

Seems like I may have fingued out thier methodolgy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Google:</p>
<p>Paris Hilton: 2,740,000<br />
Lisa Simpson: 2,690,000<br />
Marie Curie:  2,040,000<br />
Daryl Hannah: 1,520,000</p>
<p>Seems like I may have fingued out thier methodolgy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

