<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Losing Faith</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eternallyoptimistic.com/2007/07/20/losing-faith/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eternallyoptimistic.com/2007/07/20/losing-faith/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:51:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Photography as Art &#171; BatBlog</title>
		<link>http://eternallyoptimistic.com/2007/07/20/losing-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Photography as Art &#171; BatBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eternaloptimist.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/losing-faith/#comment-259</guid>
		<description>[...] one on Kate&#8217;s issues with GQ magazine) and Faith Hill (including this blog posting on the Faith Hill example) but the art of doctoring or modifying photographs has gone for as long as there have been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] one on Kate&#8217;s issues with GQ magazine) and Faith Hill (including this blog posting on the Faith Hill example) but the art of doctoring or modifying photographs has gone for as long as there have been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selfissued</title>
		<link>http://eternallyoptimistic.com/2007/07/20/losing-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>selfissued</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 04:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eternaloptimist.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/losing-faith/#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Faith looks like she&#039;s genuinely smiling and present in the real photo.  Can&#039;t say the same for the retouch.

-- Mike Jones</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faith looks like she&#8217;s genuinely smiling and present in the real photo.  Can&#8217;t say the same for the retouch.</p>
<p>&#8211; Mike Jones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Norman</title>
		<link>http://eternallyoptimistic.com/2007/07/20/losing-faith/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eternaloptimist.wordpress.com/2007/07/20/losing-faith/#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Well, Pam, this old codger sure doesn&#039;t see much pulchritude there.  She&#039;s too skinny, among other faults.

Now, if you want to see who gets my juices flowing (and there&#039;s not much juice left), try &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wic.org/bio/embery.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Joan Embry&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Pam, this old codger sure doesn&#8217;t see much pulchritude there.  She&#8217;s too skinny, among other faults.</p>
<p>Now, if you want to see who gets my juices flowing (and there&#8217;s not much juice left), try <a href="http://www.wic.org/bio/embery.htm" rel="nofollow">Joan Embry</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
