On the infinitely nested abstraction that is a (meta-)*system
System or metasystem?Take your pick;Someone will always disagree.-- The Eternal Optimist
11 Responses to “On the infinitely nested abstraction that is a (meta-)*system” |
|
On the infinitely nested abstraction that is a (meta-)*systemSystem or metasystem?Take your pick;Someone will always disagree.-- The Eternal Optimist 11 Responses to “On the infinitely nested abstraction that is a (meta-)*system” |
|
Nice – here is mine (since I promised not to blog about this anymore ;-)):
—
A meta-system:
Rules or Deployment? Aleph Null
Might be the answer.
— beuchelt
Whatever choice you make
There exists an analyst who will support
(if you are big)
– Eternal Cynic
meta or system;
come, let’s argue about it
from farther away
–notabob
nests of abstractions;
spring’s meta-rant still barren,
yet progress happens
It doesn’t matter
System or metasystem
It is what it is.
Too much argument
Energy deflected by
Pam’s verbal Judo.
There once was a girl from Nantucket
Who kept her systems in bucket
So you’ll never know
Which way it will go
Is it meta or system? ah phuckit
I love hai ku.
There once was a Metasystem from Microsoft … (D’oh!)
All the children play
This flower touches that one
Who suffers?
Abstract or concrete?
Metasystems have their place:
A pondful of drops…