<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Azigo A-go-goes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eternallyoptimistic.com/2009/01/13/azigo-a-go-goes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eternallyoptimistic.com/2009/01/13/azigo-a-go-goes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:51:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: =TC</title>
		<link>http://eternallyoptimistic.com/2009/01/13/azigo-a-go-goes/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>=TC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eternaloptimist.wordpress.com/?p=753#comment-491</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve push out an update that fixes several issues including the non-matching friendly identifier. (Ours wasn&#039;t wrong, just old. We were using the older PPID algorithm, but have now updated to match the ISIP 1.5 guidelines). See the full release notes, including upgrade instructions at http://www.azigo.com/release.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve push out an update that fixes several issues including the non-matching friendly identifier. (Ours wasn&#8217;t wrong, just old. We were using the older PPID algorithm, but have now updated to match the ISIP 1.5 guidelines). See the full release notes, including upgrade instructions at <a href="http://www.azigo.com/release.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.azigo.com/release.html</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drummond Reed</title>
		<link>http://eternallyoptimistic.com/2009/01/13/azigo-a-go-goes/comment-page-1/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Drummond Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eternaloptimist.wordpress.com/?p=753#comment-490</guid>
		<description>As VP Infrastructure for Parity, I can assure the previous commenter that Parity takes security of &quot;cards-in-the-cloud&quot; _very_ seriously, and we have been doing an great deal of work to prepare higher-security solutions involving stronger authentication and other protections for the cardstore. Cards-in-the-cloud have many advantages just like storing your money in a bank instead of under a mattress has many advantages, but in both cases you must trust that you&#039;re the only one accessing/controlling the information.

=Drummond
http://xri.net/=drummond.reed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As VP Infrastructure for Parity, I can assure the previous commenter that Parity takes security of &#8220;cards-in-the-cloud&#8221; _very_ seriously, and we have been doing an great deal of work to prepare higher-security solutions involving stronger authentication and other protections for the cardstore. Cards-in-the-cloud have many advantages just like storing your money in a bank instead of under a mattress has many advantages, but in both cases you must trust that you&#8217;re the only one accessing/controlling the information.</p>
<p>=Drummond<br />
<a href="http://xri.net/=drummond.reed" rel="nofollow">http://xri.net/=drummond.reed</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a reader</title>
		<link>http://eternallyoptimistic.com/2009/01/13/azigo-a-go-goes/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>a reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eternaloptimist.wordpress.com/?p=753#comment-489</guid>
		<description>Maybe Azigo allows only for password protection of i-cards because it&#039;s an early version, and initial users will use it only for low assurance applications, like blog postings.  Hopefully the next iteration will support stronger forms of authentication.  I&#039;m assuming here that the savvy folks who developed Azigo recognize that high assurance applications require stronger forms of authentication.....especially when the i-cards are stored in the cloud.  Or do people believe that there are no high assurance applications that might benefit from i-cards?  I hope not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Azigo allows only for password protection of i-cards because it&#8217;s an early version, and initial users will use it only for low assurance applications, like blog postings.  Hopefully the next iteration will support stronger forms of authentication.  I&#8217;m assuming here that the savvy folks who developed Azigo recognize that high assurance applications require stronger forms of authentication&#8230;..especially when the i-cards are stored in the cloud.  Or do people believe that there are no high assurance applications that might benefit from i-cards?  I hope not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
